Washington State residents who voted in favor of privatizing
liquor sales were eight times more likely to express a desire to change their
original vote than residents who voted against the measure, according to a
study from the Alcohol Research Group, a program of the Public Health
Institute, published today in the Journal of Studies on Alcohol and Drugs.
Findings suggested that 20 percent of individuals who voted
in 2011 to end the government monopoly on liquor sales have changed their minds
after living with the impact of the initiative for the past few years.
Initiative 1183, which came into effect in July 2012, called for closing
state-run liquor stores and allowing state licensing of private retailers.
“Our study not only shows that many people changed their
minds about privatization, but more importantly, those who now say they wish
they had voted no might have been a large enough group to defeat the measure in
2011, had they known its real impact at the time,” said lead author Meenakshi
Sabina Subbaraman, Ph.D., a biostatistician with the Alcohol Research Group.
“We also found that the people who changed their minds
appeared to be more concerned with the increase in the number of liquor stores
available after the vote than they were about alcohol abuse among youth or the
fact that alcohol now costs more,” said Subbaraman.
As of 2015, there were approximately 1,600 stores in
Washington selling spirits, compared with 330 stores before privatization. The
state’s new tax rates on spirits are, by far, the highest in the country.
“The lack of concern about tax rates was surprising
considering that liquor prices have increased from 5 to 15 percent on average
since privatization, depending on container size,” said William C. Kerr, Ph.D.,
a senior scientist at the Alcohol Research Group who co-authored the study and
has published previously on the results of the Washington State initiative. “It
seems that voters had a strong reaction to seeing liquor in many types of
stores where it wasn’t available before.”
The study used data from a large general population sample
of over 1,200 adults surveyed in 2014 to look at the relationship between
characteristics including demographics, spirits use and voting choice and how
these factors are related to the desire to change one’s vote.
There are currently 17 states in the U.S. that control the
sale of liquor—and, in some cases, wine—at the wholesale level through
government agencies, including Washington’s neighboring states of Oregon and
Idaho. Grocers and other groups in some of these states often push for ending
the government monopoly. Earlier this year, grocers in Oregon were aiming to
put an initiative to privatize sales on the state’s November ballot. And
Pennsylvania is making steps to ease state control by permitting wine sales in
grocery stores and direct shipments to homes from out of state.
“Perhaps if we can better predict what such a change in
policy will look like, people will have more confidence in their vote,” said
Subbaraman. “Residents of other states that are considering liquor
privatization should be aware that enough yes-voters in Washington changed
their minds after the fact that, were the election to be held today, the state
would likely vote to keep the monopoly.”
Download the paper or view the abstract:
http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/?term=Opinions+on+the+privatization+of+distilled-spirits+sales+in+Washington+State%3A+Did+voters+change+their+minds%3F
Subbaraman, M. S.
& Kerr, W. C. (July 2016). Opinions on the privatization of distilled-spirits
sales in Washington State: Did voters change their minds? Journal of Studies on
Alcohol and Drugs, 77(4), 568-576.
Research reported in
this press release was supported by National Institute on Alcohol Abuse and
Alcoholism of the National Institutes of Health under award number R01AA021742.
The content is solely
the responsibility of the authors and does not necessarily represent the
official views of the National Institutes of Health.
If you are interested
in arranging an interview with Meenakshi Sabina Subbaraman, Ph.D., or William
C., Kerr, Ph.D., contact Diane Schmidt at (510) 898-5819 or dschmidt@arg.org.